Caterpillar's CAT marks continue to prevail over Puma's PROCAT
Australia
Legal updates: case law analysis and intelligence
The primary judge correctly found that Puma's PROCAT mark is deceptively similar to Caterpillar's CAT marks, and that use of the PROCAT mark would cause deception or confusion because of Caterpillar's reputation in its CAT marks.
To read more
Register for free for limited access
Register for free to receive our newsletter, view leading trademark professionals in WTR 1000 and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Register now
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the WTR experts.
Subscribe now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10