JPO finds that MONO+ is not similar to MONO
Japan
Legal updates: case law analysis and intelligence
A key finding was that the marks were dissimilar visually and phonetically due to the presence of the element ‘+’ in the mark applied for.
To read more
Register for free for limited access
Register for free to receive our newsletter, view leading trademark professionals in WTR 1000 and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Register now
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the WTR experts.
Subscribe now
Already have access? Login below
Copyright © Law Business ResearchCompany Number: 03281866 VAT: GB 160 7529 10