Why the USPTO’s Lawful Use rule is well past its prime
Shutterstock/VladimirKoval
In this week’s opinion, Ritter Spencer Cheng’s Chelsie Spencer argues that, by insisting that cannabis-related marks must be for use in lawful commerce, the USPTO is overstepping its statutory authority and applying its own rules inconsistently.
To read more
Register for free for limited access
Register for free to receive our newsletter, view leading trademark professionals in WTR 1000 and gain limited access to subscriber content.
Register now
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the WTR experts.
Subscribe now